Editorial Independence
Commercial relationships do not determine rankings, verdicts, or whether a product is reviewed at all. Pages are written to explain fit, tradeoffs, and risk, not to maximize conversions.
How We Source Claims
We rely on official product documentation, fee pages, policy pages, support resources, public incident history, and hands-on review workflows where available. When a claim cannot be confidently reverified, we either remove it or qualify the uncertainty directly in the page copy.
Scoring and Recommendations
Scores are category-aware. Exchanges are weighted more heavily on security controls, liquidity, fees, and operational clarity. Wallets are weighted more heavily on custody model, recovery flow, and device trust assumptions. Tax tools and bots are judged on reliability, transparency, and error visibility rather than marketing claims.
Affiliate Disclosure Standard
When a page includes affiliate links, the disclosure must appear near the relevant calls to action. Affiliate relationships may support site operations, but they do not override negative findings, weak fit notes, or alternatives.
Corrections and Updates
We update pages after meaningful changes in product pricing, legal availability, security posture, or feature access. If you spot a factual issue, contact us through the site contact page. Material corrections are prioritized over cosmetic edits.
What We Avoid
- Guaranteed-return language or price-prediction framing
- Unqualified safety claims for custody or leverage products
- Review conclusions based only on screenshots or marketing copy
- Hidden affiliate relationships